uBugtrack
Plans & pricing
Login/Register Free
uBugtrack
Plans & pricing
Tasks/Issues
Releases
Crashes
Stats
Login/Register Free
Tasks/Issues List
Releases
Crash Reporter
Stats
Edit #278
Project
CBTS - Dev - obsoleted
Opened by
XinYi.Quek
On
2017-03-27
Status
Open
Labels
Information
Priority
Assigned To
Not assigned
External ID
Open in release
Fixed/Target in release
Enable Markdown -
Preview
What Is Markdown?
### General 1. To retrieve booking/MRWB list when issuing invoice and costing, we need a start and end window or else the list will grow too huge as time goes by. For invoice, we control by only returning list of bookings with **unbilled service charges**. However, there is no way to control the size of booking list for costing. Should we consider re-implementing the lock booking feature? Please advise. ### Customer/Internal Invoice 1. At which status an invoice is allowed to create CN/DN for? Right now we suggest only allowing the user to create CN/DN after the invoice is in confirmed state. 1. Does CN / DN have pay on behalf? Right now we assume yes and implement in that direction. Please let us know if this is incorrect. 1. Please help us to clarify: - Would TH side want to use their format for tax invoice, CN/DN and receipt, or use our standard version? - Sample template for CN/DN. ### Costing 1. When a vendor bill us on one batch without itemized billing, how do we decide in what proportion the cost is to be distributed back to individual bookings? For example, the vendor bill us $10,000 for 3 shipments (1 FTL, 2 LTL). How to decide how much cost each booking bear? Note that: - All 3 shipments are from different routes (different mileage). - Cost for the FTL shipment has unfair advantage if calculated based on chargeable weight. 1. How to handle when vendor issue to us a CN/DN for previously confirmed invoice in CBTS? Please also consider impact on SUN4. ### Invoice Print Templates 1. The standard print template is as attached. 1. The normal invoice and tax invoice will carry the same layout and contents. The only difference between the two is the document title, which will show whether the printout is an "Invoice" or "Tax Invoice". 1. Normal and tax invoice shall be treated the same in CBTS. It is only a print configuration to show as the printout title. 1. This approach is similar for invoice, CN and DN. #### Invoice printout types | | Invoice | Tax Invoice |---|---|---| | KART-MY | A4: Standard template | A4: Standard template | | | DM: Standard template | DM: Standard template | | KART-TH | A4: Standard template | A4: Standard template | | | DM: Standard template | DM: Standard template | | KART-VN | A4: Standard template | A4: Standard template | | | DM: Standard template | DM: Text only, printed on provided template | | KART-CN | A4: Standard template | A4: Not applicable | | | DM: Standard template | DM: Not applicable
[Billing] - Uncertainties to billing implementation
General
To retrieve booking/MRWB list when issuing invoice and costing, we need a start and end window or else the list will grow too huge as time goes by. For invoice, we control by only returning list of bookings with
unbilled service charges
. However, there is no way to control the size of booking list for costing. Should we consider re-implementing the lock booking feature? Please advise.
Customer/Internal Invoice
At which status an invoice is allowed to create CN/DN for? Right now we suggest only allowing the user to create CN/DN after the invoice is in confirmed state.
Does CN / DN have pay on behalf? Right now we assume yes and implement in that direction. Please let us know if this is incorrect.
Please help us to clarify:
Would TH side want to use their format for tax invoice, CN/DN and receipt, or use our standard version?
Sample template for CN/DN.
Costing
When a vendor bill us on one batch without itemized billing, how do we decide in what proportion the cost is to be distributed back to individual bookings?
For example, the vendor bill us $10,000 for 3 shipments (1 FTL, 2 LTL). How to decide how much cost each booking bear? Note that:
All 3 shipments are from different routes (different mileage).
Cost for the FTL shipment has unfair advantage if calculated based on chargeable weight.
How to handle when vendor issue to us a CN/DN for previously confirmed invoice in CBTS? Please also consider impact on SUN4.
Invoice Print Templates
The standard print template is as attached.
The normal invoice and tax invoice will carry the same layout and contents. The only difference between the two is the document title, which will show whether the printout is an "Invoice" or "Tax Invoice".
Normal and tax invoice shall be treated the same in CBTS. It is only a print configuration to show as the printout title.
This approach is similar for invoice, CN and DN.
Invoice printout types
Invoice
Tax Invoice
KART-MY
A4: Standard template
A4: Standard template
DM: Standard template
DM: Standard template
KART-TH
A4: Standard template
A4: Standard template
DM: Standard template
DM: Standard template
KART-VN
A4: Standard template
A4: Standard template
DM: Standard template
DM: Text only, printed on provided template
KART-CN
A4: Standard template
A4: Not applicable
DM: Standard template
DM: Not applicable
Comments
Commits
Thomas Tsang
Friday March 31, 2017 - 03:57:42
General-01: we will implement lock booking feature. Also you should consider pagination + quick search to solve the matter.
Customer-01: okay.
Customer-02: yes, we do.
Customer-03: may you send me a copy of the standard invoice, cn & dn, i shall confirm with TH via email afterward and cc you.
Customer-03: CN & DN & Invoice is sharing the same template, except the title is different.
Costing-01: it is a cashier feature. To allow user to fill in the amount manually and support partial payment for bookings.
Costing-02: Similar to customer billing.
Steven Loh
Monday April 03, 2017 - 09:35:11
Updated section Invoice Print Templates with standard invoice template attachment.
Display Comment and Event
All
Only Comment
Only Event
You don't have any commit attached on this ticket.
How integrate with source control
WARNING !!
Are you sure you want to delete ticket #278 ?